期刊名： Behavioral Sciences

期刊主页：https://www.mdpi.com/journal/behavsci

还在为筛选文献而发愁？别急，这份“行为科学与人工智能”方向的文献清单，也许能为你提供灵感！

1. Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas

人类与人工智能主体在道德困境中的道德判断

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/2/181

Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Yu, F.; Xu, L. Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020181

2. You Are Not Alone: A Serial Mediation of Social Attraction, Privacy Concerns, and Satisfaction in Voice AI Use

你并不孤单：社交吸引力、隐私担忧和满意度在语音人工智能使用中的系列中介作用

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/5/431

Choi, T.R.; Choi, J.H. You Are Not Alone: A Serial Mediation of Social Attraction, Privacy Concerns, and Satisfaction in Voice AI Use. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050431

3. Unveiling the e-Servicescape of ChatGPT: Exploring User Psychology and Engagement in AI-Powered Chatbot Experiences

揭开 ChatGPT 的电子服务格局：探索人工智能聊天机器人体验中的用户心理和参与度

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/7/558

Kim, M. Unveiling the e-Servicescape of ChatGPT: Exploring User Psychology and Engagement in AI-Powered Chatbot Experiences. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070558

4. Comparing ChatGPT Feedback and Peer Feedback in Shaping Students’ Evaluative Judgement of Statistical Analysis: A Case Study

比较ChatGPT反馈和同伴反馈在塑造学生对统计分析的评价判断方面的作用：一项案例研究

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/7/884

Xie, X.; Zhang, L.J.; Wilson, A.J. Comparing ChatGPT Feedback and Peer Feedback in Shaping Students’ Evaluative Judgement of Statistical Analysis: A Case Study. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 884. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070884

5. The Role of Individual Capabilities in Maximizing the Benefits for Students Using GenAI Tools in Higher Education

个人能力如何助力高等教育学生最大化获取生成式 AI 工具的益处

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/3/328

Qi, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y. The Role of Individual Capabilities in Maximizing the Benefits for Students Using GenAI Tools in Higher Education. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030328

6. Pre-Service Teachers’ GenAI Anxiety, Technology Self-Efficacy, and TPACK: Their Structural Relations with Behavioral Intention to Design GenAI-Assisted Teaching

职前教师的GenAI焦虑、技术自我效能感和TPACK：它们与设计GenAI辅助教学的行为意向之间的结构关系

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/5/373

Wang, K.; Ruan, Q.; Zhang, X.; Fu, C.; Duan, B. Pre-Service Teachers’ GenAI Anxiety, Technology Self-Efficacy, and TPACK: Their Structural Relations with Behavioral Intention to Design GenAI-Assisted Teaching. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050373

7. AI Experience Predicts Identification with Humankind

人工智能经验预测对人类的认同

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/2/89

Wang, C.; Peng, K. AI Experience Predicts Identification with Humankind. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020089

8. A Systematic Review of Responses, Attitudes, and Utilization Behaviors on Generative AI for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

对高等教育中生成式人工智能在教学中的应用反应、态度和使用行为的系统性综述

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/4/467

Wu, F.; Dang, Y.; Li, M. A Systematic Review of Responses, Attitudes, and Utilization Behaviors on Generative AI for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040467

9. Latent Profile Analysis of AI Literacy and Trust in Mathematics Teachers and Their Relations with AI Dependency and 21st-Century Skills

人工智能素养和数学教师信任度的潜在剖面分析及其与人工智能依赖性和21世纪技能的关系

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/11/1008

Wijaya, T.T.; Yu, Q.; Cao, Y.; He, Y.; Leung, F.K.S. Latent Profile Analysis of AI Literacy and Trust in Mathematics Teachers and Their Relations with AI Dependency and 21st-Century Skills. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111008

10. The Usage of AI in Teaching and Students’ Creativity: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement and the Moderating Role of AI Literacy

人工智能在教学中的应用与学生创造力：学习投入的中介作用和人工智能素养的调节作用

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/5/587

Zhou, M.; Peng, S. The Usage of AI in Teaching and Students’ Creativity: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement and the Moderating Role of AI Literacy. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050587

11. When Healthcare Professionals Use AI: Exploring Work Well-Being Through Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Job Complexity

当医疗保健专业人员使用人工智能时：通过心理需求满足和工作复杂性探索工作幸福感

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/1/88

Huo, W.; Li, Q.; Liang, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. When Healthcare Professionals Use AI: Exploring Work Well-Being Through Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Job Complexity. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010088

12. Exploring the Effectiveness of Cooperative Pre-Service Teacher and Generative AI Writing Feedback on Chinese Writing

探究合作式职前教师与生成式人工智能写作反馈对中文写作的有效性

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/4/518

Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, J. Exploring the Effectiveness of Cooperative Pre-Service Teacher and Generative AI Writing Feedback on Chinese Writing. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040518

13. Enhancing Critical Writing Through AI Feedback: A Randomized Control Study

利用人工智能反馈提升批判性写作能力：一项随机对照研究

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/5/600

Zhang, K. Enhancing Critical Writing Through AI Feedback: A Randomized Control Study. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050600

14. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Impact of Need Satisfaction on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Mediated by Self-Regulated Learning Strategies

高等教育中的人工智能：需求满足对人工智能素养的影响——以自我调节学习策略为中介

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/2/165

Wang, K.; Cui, W.; Yuan, X. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Impact of Need Satisfaction on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Mediated by Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020165

15. Adopting Generative AI in Future Classrooms: A Study of Preservice Teachers’ Intentions and Influencing Factors

在未来课堂中应用生成式人工智能：一项关于职前教师意向及影响因素的研究

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/8/1040

https://susy.mdpi.com/user/assigned/process_form/fb0a4d281eff2ec4657de2eff9481eb5

期刊介绍

主编：Jerrell Cassady, Ball State University, USA

Behavioral Sciences(ISSN 2076-328X)，创立于2011年，是一个国际性的同行评审开放获取期刊（月刊），其研究领域广泛，涵盖心理学、认知科学、精神病学、神经科学和组织行为学等相关领域研究，现已被SSCI、Scopus、PubMed、PMC、PsycInfo（APA）等国际知名数据库收录

2025 Impact Factor：3.2

2025 CiteScore：4.1

Time to First Decision：27.7 Days

Acceptance to Publication：3.9 Days